Quote:
Originally Posted by herbyhawk
my arguement lies in how good this class is in how the talking heads percieve this class is, and that is by rankings, the more they promote Iowa, the better it is for Iowa, especially TV coverage.
Indiana got their matchup with Kentucky and their top 25 ranking because of the incoming Class rankings.
in the end i guess it doesn't matter tha Iowa doesn't get that respect so many of you complain that Iowa doesn't get, nor does it appear that you want that type of respect to get National TV coverage the rankings bring.
do i realize the * doesn't help a kid in his playing ability; yes i get that, but unlike you i want the national respect that a higher ranked class gets
|
Herby you are just ridiculos!
According to Scout October 5th 2011 they had Iowa's class ranked at #16 and I have seen various services that have Iowa anywhere between 16-30 which is a solid class considering everything. What the heck else do you want? It's like you are just feel like making completely stupid arguments. What you have been saying is utterly stupid.
Iowa is getting plenty of respect. Announcers mention Woodbury all the time and at times even mention Gesell. I don't know what the heck else you want.
You are making completely baseless arguments about Iowa being slighted somehow.
Rivals Rankings:
Woodbury 42nd best player in his class and the 7th best center
Gesell 96th best player in his class and the 21st rated point guard
Ingram 3 star. Has probably not played enough big time AAU tournaments to be ranked
Clemmons 3 star. Has probably not played enough big time AAU tournaments to be ranked.
Both Ingram and Clemmons seem to be performing well in large school basketball in largely populated states so they must be decent.
Git it a rest Herby.