Quote:
Originally Posted by WindyCityHawkI
These moves are just like the state of the program. Boring, predictable, and unwilling to adapt or change.
What about the direction of this program makes ferentz think we shouldn't be bringing in some sort of new ideas? Why is he so afraid to try something new?
While Phil parker isn't necessarily a bad hire, the fact we waited this long and then move all the coaches to new positions they are used to coaching just makes zero sense.
I actually think soup Campbell will be a decent hire at off coord, it better not be Lester erb. They may as well announce one of them tomorrow because we know they won't even interview anyone outside the program, because
Heaven forbid some new ideas and wrinkles get introduced.
I wish someone would acutally ask some tough questions to Kirk tomorrow. The coaches and reporters around seem to be a bunch of yes men these days.
|
I asked this during the season, but what wrinkles on defense would have made the defense better during the season? I think the defense had prolly 3 bad games, Pitt, MSU and Nebraska. Pitt, the offense bailed them out, but the D held in the clutch. MSU we just flat out got beaten. Outmatched in every aspect of the game, but the O and ST had some bad TOs. Nebraska, the D was fine most of the game, but had problems late after being on the field the whole game. ISU OTs were not good defense, but we had a critical injury (Bernstine) in the secondary and clearly lacked depth at CB we needed to win that game. If Bernstine's healthy, I think we win - the FB being out hurt our offense as well and prolly cost us some TOP.
We do not have the athletes to beat Oregon in a 65-63 slugfest. We just don't. The soft 4-3 we play gives us the best chance to win with the guys we get; unfortunately it takes time to develop the players and get everyone on the same page, but when that defense gels, it is downright nasty like it was in 2009. We had guys who could put games away then. No schematic change was going to make the guys we had on that defense any better than they were in our base D in 2011.