1. What's not on the table is the money from Texas' 20-year, $300 million deal with ESPN to create the Longhorn Network, which has been blamed in large part for Texas A&M's pending departure from the Big 12.
"That's never been in play, that's not in play," Texas athletic director DeLoss Dodds said.
2.It's about quality, not quantity," Dodds said. "In my mind, 10 is the perfect conference. You have a clear path to the national championship game without stumbling in a (conference) championship game."
If those are hard and fast positions then I don't see Oklahoma or Missouri agreeing. I don't think they will be willing to sign on to any long term commitment and an increase in penalties to leave the conference. I hope ISU refuses to accept Texas terms just because of the dollar signs. They and the other members can establish a nice conference without Texas. They can make it attractive. Maybe without a Texas the conference can be stabilized.
"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both." Milton Friedman
Isu will cave in to anything that Texas demands. They know they have nowhere to go without Texas.
That couldnt be further from the truth.ISU will be one of the first to
vote against what Texas demands.They have said that they realize they are stuck in the Big 12 -with or without Texas.
If a vote to evict Texas happened i think it would be the greatest thing to happen to the Big 12 and if it passed adding West Virginia, BYU, TCU, and Boise State wouldn't equal Texas revenue but for once the Conference could see stability and even more stellar football.