Wisconsin running backs.... - HawkeyeNation Forum
Reply Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2011, 11:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
HawkForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,214
Wisconsin running backs....

Has any other school in the history of man had more RB's seem to be amazing and then leave early because they felt they were being replaced by a younger version and not do much in the NFL??
Off the top of my head:
1. Brian Calhoun
2. PJ Hill
3. John Clay
4. Montee Ball? (might make it in the NFL but still forgoing senior season...

All these guys skipped their senior year and didn't make any splash in the NFL...is it something in the attitude up in Madison "sorry we're going with the younger horse in the stable" or what?
__________________
I'm not saying Fran might be the next Bob Knight....I'm saying Fran IS the next Bob Knight!! ARGHHH FIRE OKEEFE

12/20/2011 - The day I became a full fledged believer in AIRBHG
1/10/2012 - The day I began fearing AIRBHG
3/29/2012 - SERIOUSLY AIRBHG?? c'mon man

Will be retiring from HN when Post Count reaches: 4,321
HawkForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 12:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junior
 
Ihawk209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 387
Re: Wisconsin running backs....



yeah, probably not the appeal of an NFL contract...
Ihawk209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 12:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
tm3308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corydon/Iowa City, IA
Posts: 9,282
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Ball definitely isn't leaving because he feels like he's going to get replaced by White. You could make that case for Hill and Clay. But Ball's draft stock is soaring right now, and it won't get much higher if he stays. His situation is a little closer to Shonn Greene's than any of Wisky's previous backs.
__________________
Response to Coker Thread hater:

This thread was born from humble beginnings. A simple question was asked, and d-bag decided to answer it in a condescending manner. We then proceeded to chastise him. Since then a myriad of topics have ranged from the sensible (Who would win in jousting, Tony Mo or Moped Man?), to the ludicrous (STATE actually landing an attractive woman ). You sir, are a clonebag, attempting to bring us down! This will not be permitted nor tolerated. RELEASE THE KRAKEN!!!!!!
tm3308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 834
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Include Ron Dayne is this discussion. He didnt leave early but he was close to an NFL bust. Wisconsin has huge offensive lines with great talent at the college level. When these rbs get to the NFL and their O-line isnt dominant them maybe it shows in their worse stats

I dont blame a rb for leaving college to go pro as early as they can because MOST of them only have so many carries in their legs. Thomas Jones is an anomoly. There are a lot of great NFL backs that boom just lose it from one season to the next.

Actually, I think Brad Rogers might be a hawk who can have a long term pro career if he gets on the right team. Good blocking fb who can catch the ball and carry it.
uihawk82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:05 PM   #5 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
HawkForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,214
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihawk209 View Post


yeah, probably not the appeal of an NFL contract...
three of these guys never got a big NFL contract...they just decided to forgo their senior year. Ball will most likely get a big contract...but Hill, Calhoun, and Clay did not.
__________________
I'm not saying Fran might be the next Bob Knight....I'm saying Fran IS the next Bob Knight!! ARGHHH FIRE OKEEFE

12/20/2011 - The day I became a full fledged believer in AIRBHG
1/10/2012 - The day I began fearing AIRBHG
3/29/2012 - SERIOUSLY AIRBHG?? c'mon man

Will be retiring from HN when Post Count reaches: 4,321
HawkForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 317
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Montee Ball projects much better as an NFL prospect than any of the guys you mentioned. tm is correct, Ball would be an idiot if he chose to stay. After a season like he just had... he needs to go now. He won't gain anything by staying another year. It's not like he'd have a chance at making more money in next years draft. He's proven what he can do at the college level and it's been very impressive. This is coming from someone who hates the Badgers with a passion. I do think Montee Ball will have a solid NFL career if he stays healthy.
DP5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
HawkForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,214
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Quote:
Originally Posted by DP5555 View Post
Montee Ball projects much better as an NFL prospect than any of the guys you mentioned. tm is correct, Ball would be an idiot if he chose to stay. After a season like he just had... he needs to go now. He won't gain anything by staying another year. It's not like he'd have a chance at making more money in next years draft. He's proven what he can do at the college level and it's been very impressive. This is coming from someone who hates the Badgers with a passion. I do think Montee Ball will have a solid NFL career if he stays healthy.
But that's what I'm confuseled about....none of them projected very well to the next level...so why not stay and try to finish up the degree?
__________________
I'm not saying Fran might be the next Bob Knight....I'm saying Fran IS the next Bob Knight!! ARGHHH FIRE OKEEFE

12/20/2011 - The day I became a full fledged believer in AIRBHG
1/10/2012 - The day I began fearing AIRBHG
3/29/2012 - SERIOUSLY AIRBHG?? c'mon man

Will be retiring from HN when Post Count reaches: 4,321
HawkForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
spliff45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ames
Posts: 2,145
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Quote:
Originally Posted by uihawk82 View Post
Include Ron Dayne is this discussion. He didnt leave early but he was close to an NFL bust. Wisconsin has huge offensive lines with great talent at the college level. When these rbs get to the NFL and their O-line isnt dominant them maybe it shows in their worse stats

I dont blame a rb for leaving college to go pro as early as they can because MOST of them only have so many carries in their legs. Thomas Jones is an anomoly. There are a lot of great NFL backs that boom just lose it from one season to the next.

Actually, I think Brad Rogers might be a hawk who can have a long term pro career if he gets on the right team. Good blocking fb who can catch the ball and carry it.
Speaking of Wisconsin's OL, I heard a stat the other day where the average size of their OL is larger than all but two NFL teams. The Chargers and someone else, just can't remember. That's crazy.
__________________
All time bowl wins: Ricky Stanzi: 3
Iowa State: 3
spliff45 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 03:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 317
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

I see what you're saying now HawkForce. I don't know I guess it's been awhile so I'm not real familiar with their individual situations. I just know that Ball didn't leave because he was afraid a younger guy would take his spot. He'll leave because now is by far the best time for him to go.

As far as the other guys go... you're probably right regarding their potential in the NFL. I know PJ Hill, Ron Dayne, and Clay were just all too big and slow to be productive players in the NFL. That kind of size just doesn't succeed at the highest level. I'd say Brandon Jacobs is comparible to them, but he's much more explosive. I wouldn't even consider Jacobs to be a consistent every down NFL running back. He's a situational guy. When he is able to get his momentum going I'd hate to be the linebacker or DB who has to tackle him.
DP5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 07:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

System running backs. Same problem as pass-happy schools have with system QBs.
PhoenixHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 07:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Re:Wisconsin running backs....

What the heck is a "system" RB? Running the ball is not a real technical scheme. You can either run it or u can't
Itownhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 08:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itownhawk View Post
What the heck is a "system" RB? Running the ball is not a real technical scheme. You can either run it or u can't

Same thing as a system QB. Of course a running game can be as schematic as a passing game. It has to do with the size of their OL and how often they pull their guards and center. It's how they focus so much on developing the push of their OL in run support at the expense of the developing the great footwork of great pass protect OL. It has to do with running more often instead of having a balanced offense, which wears down an opposing DL more quickly, and gives more carries to the RBs.
PhoenixHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 08:24 PM   #13 (permalink)
Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Re:Wisconsin running backs....

Guess I didn't realize the size of your O line and the push they get was schematic. I don't think this "scheme" has anything to do with not being successful at the next level. And going by your logic these guys should be pro bowl backs considering the size and push NFL linemen should get :)
Itownhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 10:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
tm3308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corydon/Iowa City, IA
Posts: 9,282
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itownhawk View Post
Guess I didn't realize the size of your O line and the push they get was schematic. I don't think this "scheme" has anything to do with not being successful at the next level. And going by your logic these guys should be pro bowl backs considering the size and push NFL linemen should get
It's not so much a schematic system as it's often elite NFL talent up front masking often mediocre NFL talent in the backfield. I think Ball is the real deal, but many of Wisconsin's backs were never very good NFL prospects. They were great college backs because they benefited from an elite line. That's a perfect system for a running back, even if it's got nothing to do with schemes.
__________________
Response to Coker Thread hater:

This thread was born from humble beginnings. A simple question was asked, and d-bag decided to answer it in a condescending manner. We then proceeded to chastise him. Since then a myriad of topics have ranged from the sensible (Who would win in jousting, Tony Mo or Moped Man?), to the ludicrous (STATE actually landing an attractive woman ). You sir, are a clonebag, attempting to bring us down! This will not be permitted nor tolerated. RELEASE THE KRAKEN!!!!!!
tm3308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 10:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,275
Re: Wisconsin running backs....

i dont get WHY they leave if they know they wont get drafted. at least finish school.
9YRPLAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0