Results 31 to 45 of 80
Thread: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
-
05-07-2012, 10:13 PM #31
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
From a trust factor i cant see Bowlsby getting rid of any members of the of the big 12 conference. I do think getting Florida st and Clemson would be huge win for the big 12. Does any one know when the big tens tv contracts are up? If the big ten expands i hope the following teams come in Duke, North Carolina, Maryland, and Virgina. This is a lot of big huge tv markets.
-
05-07-2012, 10:16 PM #32
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
“Really, Rick and the offensive line knew we were going to get it done. Nothing was going to stop us. You could’ve put 24 players out on defense and we were going to somehow get it done.”-DJK-
-
05-07-2012, 11:23 PM #33HN Legend
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 7,743
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
I wouldn't expect Duke and Carolina. Only need one Carolina school to expand that footprint. Also think this is why Maryland is possible. True, they aren't a big football school, but it expands the footprint. ND is the only school I could see that wouldn't expand the footprint that I could see the B1G going after.
-
05-07-2012, 11:29 PM #34
-
05-08-2012, 04:22 AM #35HN Legend
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 7,743
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
They are tied together, but that is contingent on the ACC. If the ACC implodes, Duke will look really attractive to the basketball schools, but not so much for the football schools. Carolina will definitely want to be in a primary football conference.
They can always play an annual game like Louisville/UK.
Wake is also an interesting case. That could be the one that Bowlsby goes after. So it could end up like this UNC(B1G) NC State (SEC) Wake (B12) Duke (BE/ACC).
This is a pure thinking off the top of my head guess.
-
05-08-2012, 05:48 AM #36
-
05-08-2012, 06:03 AM #37
-
05-08-2012, 06:14 AM #38HN Legend
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 7,743
-
05-08-2012, 07:38 AM #39Senior
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 713
-
05-08-2012, 07:47 AM #40
-
05-08-2012, 07:52 AM #41Senior
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 713
-
05-08-2012, 01:16 PM #42
-
05-08-2012, 02:26 PM #43Senior
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 729
-
05-08-2012, 02:31 PM #44
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
It would be amusing and somewhat fitting if that happened (water does eventually seek it's own level) but won't affect Iowa much one way of the other. "Dreams"? Hardly.
Though I understand that Clones do have dreams about Iowa. Or rather...about becoming an Iowa. And they are most definitely dreams.
We're the dominant program in the state...always have been, even in down years. That ain't about to change.
-
05-08-2012, 03:44 PM #45HN Legend
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 4,416
Re: Bowlsby Vs. The ACC
On College Football Live the other day,one of their announcers,Ed Something, said the way he sees it going is that out of all the chaos will be strong bb conferences like the Big East,having a different football league,where geography is unimportant...ie.Boise for football,but not bb. Travel to Boise for football only happens like every other year tops,so geography not nearly as important.
I could see the Big Ten,SEC,Big Twelve and Pac 12 emerging as the super four football leagues,with Boise to Pac 12 along with 3 others who are basically anywhere on the map,football only.
Then Big East and ACC are tough bb leagues with weird configurations of football schools to make out there schedules. Atlantic Ten probably gets divided to provide bb schools.
I think it is inevitable so I hope that the Big Ten ends up with ND,UNC,Md, and either Rutgers or UVa.
Those divisions would work as pods,with Iowa playing Minny,Wisky and Neb every year,and rotating among the rest. Not a huge fan of this but it is hard to see how the 4 team playoffs does not lead to 4 superleagues. If you wanted to make it a 16 team playoff,it easily could happen with each division winner playing within the league for the first couple of games to come up with the conference champ,then the semis between the SEC,Pac 12,Big 12 and Big Ten title holders and a title game of winners. It would kill the bowls,and would mean that Iowa would probably only rarely play in postseason,and fire their coach every 4 years,but some fans would be happy with that I guess....it would be their holy grail of a playoff.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks