Should Ramos be ranked #1? - HawkeyeNation Forum
Reply Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2012, 09:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Should Ramos be ranked #1?

I know alot of posters are wondering if Ramos should be ranked #1 after beating Oliver. I just noticed over the weekend that Stieber from Ohio State lost to Dardanes from Minnesota. Now I know that Ramos lost to Carter but Ramos knocked off the #1 wrestler and defending national champ.
castille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 09:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
HN Legend
 
pin2win's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,362
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

id be shocked
__________________
23 NCAA Wrestling Team Titles
32 Big Ten Conference Titles

Twitter @hagertony
pin2win is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 09:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Freshman
 
ICAlumni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 1,137
Re:Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Yes. He should be.
ICAlumni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 10:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 112
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

1. Carter
2. Ramos
3. Oliver
4. Stieber
HerkeyHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 11:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Carter beat Ramos on OT. Stieber beat Carter 7-1. Stieber loses to an unranked wrestler. Ramos beats the #1 ranked and defending national champ. I find it hard to believe Carter would be ranked #1. Maybe.
castille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 11:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 454
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

No Ramos should not be #1 atleast not until Carter loses again . I also think you'll see Kelly and Gambrall fall down if not out of the rankings, telford and lofthouse will drop out of the top ten as well, although lofthouse may hover around 10 I don't think he'll be in the top 8 as he was in most rankings.

On a side note, that midlands loss could very well haunt ramos, the only real challenge Carter will see curently is Jan 27th against #11 Keller (OK) which should allow him to go into ncaas top seed (debateable i know but stay with me). While if Ramos can remain undefeated through the rest of the big ten regular season and tournament (steiber, dardannes or thorn, quierroga, ) and national duals he would still likely draw a 2 or 3 seed with Oliver drawing the other 2 or 3 seed. Which, if this holds true, means he to will have to go through Oliver just to make finals, and I know "he's gotta see him eventually" but the team point difference in seeing him in the semis and finals is crucial in this team race
ih8olives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 11:14 AM   #7 (permalink)
Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 194
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

It doesn't matter...it will all get sorted out.
imported_UHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 11:29 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junior
 
CRlightweight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 340
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ih8olives View Post
No Ramos should not be #1 atleast not until Carter loses again . I also think you'll see Kelly and Gambrall fall down if not out of the rankings, telford and lofthouse will drop out of the top ten as well, although lofthouse may hover around 10 I don't think he'll be in the top 8 as he was in most rankings.

On a side note, that midlands loss could very well haunt ramos, the only real challenge Carter will see curently is Jan 27th against #11 Keller (OK) which should allow him to go into ncaas top seed (debateable i know but stay with me). While if Ramos can remain undefeated through the rest of the big ten regular season and tournament (steiber, dardannes or thorn, quierroga, ) and national duals he would still likely draw a 2 or 3 seed with Oliver drawing the other 2 or 3 seed. Which, if this holds true, means he to will have to go through Oliver just to make finals, and I know "he's gotta see him eventually" but the team point difference in seeing him in the semis and finals is crucial in this team race
With that scenario Ramos would have a much, much better resume than Carter and would get the #1 seed i would think. Ramos would have several quality wins w/ no bad losses and Carter would only have 1 quality win and his loss wasn't even close. But there is a lot that's gonna happen between then and now.
CRlightweight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: State Center via M'town
Posts: 1,322
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRlightweight View Post
With that scenario Ramos would have a much, much better resume than Carter and would get the #1 seed i would think. Ramos would have several quality wins w/ no bad losses and Carter would only have 1 quality win and his loss wasn't even close. But there is a lot that's gonna happen between then and now.

IF it plays out this way, Ramos would get screwed. Just as McD did last year as he had to go through Precin again. In the end though, Robles' seed was right.
pumpdog20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: State Center via M'town
Posts: 1,322
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by castille View Post
Carter beat Ramos on OT. Stieber beat Carter 7-1. Stieber loses to an unranked wrestler. Ramos beats the #1 ranked and defending national champ. I find it hard to believe Carter would be ranked #1. Maybe.
Yes Dardannes is unranked, but you can pretty much give him Thorn's ranking. He did win the SS and has appeared to over take Thorn in the lineup considering J just burnt his redshirt.
pumpdog20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 01:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 454
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRlightweight View Post
With that scenario Ramos would have a much, much better resume than Carter and would get the #1 seed i would think. Ramos would have several quality wins w/ no bad losses and Carter would only have 1 quality win and his loss wasn't even close. But there is a lot that's gonna happen between then and now.

I agree, IF it would happen I would agree with your logic and hope it plays out that way, I just feel that it has happened in the past and it could happen again, the topic got me thinking and it seems the seeding comittee often times only looks at record and if Ramos, Oliver, and Carter all go into nationals with 1 loss each; Ramos would have earned the top seed, that I don't think he will get much to his detriment.
ih8olives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 01:54 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior
 
AFHawk86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sherwood, AR
Posts: 607
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpdog20 View Post
IF it plays out this way, Ramos would get screwed. Just as McD did last year as he had to go through Precin again. In the end though, Robles' seed was right.
It might appear that way, but if McD would've been seeded #1 then Robles might have been knocked off by Precin. You never know.
AFHawk86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 02:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Toms Rankngs just came out. They have Carter#1 and Ramos#2. Telford stayed the same. Gambrall and Lofthouse both dropped a couple spots. Evans moved up one spot
castille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 03:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Re: Should Ramos be ranked #1?

Remember. Iowa and Virginia Tech could meet in the Cliff Keen Division 1 National Duals meet on Feb,12 at Hilton Coliseum in Ames. It will be Iowa,ISU.UNI,OregonST,V.TECH, and WISCONSIN.
castille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 07:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Freshman
 
ICAlumni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 1,137
Re:Should Ramos be ranked #1?

I'd love to pound the clones again.
ICAlumni is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0